|
THE Gender Intelligence
Agency (G.I.A.) thanks you for taking the time and effort to read these
pages. THE G.I. A.
has amassed an enormous amount of research and is extremely motivated to
share our findings with all interested persons. a girl and her Cock, Volume I: Natural Light begins to illuminate our
vast and ongoing investigation and exploration into what we call the Gender
Galaxy. Please stay tuned for
the next four Volumes! Together,
all five Volumes consist of a deliberate attempt to destabilize preconceived
notions of the photograph, definitions of gender, and understanding of
performance. Each volume separately, as well as the entire collection, is at
once an archive and fine art, an intervention and activism, a playful play in
all the ways that word may imply, with four different one-act monologues, and
a documentary celebration of the performance of one specific gender: a girl
and her Cock, in the theatre of life presented to, for, and in collaboration
with the camera. This
document contains four temporal experiences of gender that may and many times
are, no longer current happenings of the lived experience of gender, and as a
result, functions as a direct testament to the fluidity of gender identity.
|
We
at THE G.I.A. are committed to unraveling the confusing concept, commonly
assumed to be concrete, and subconsciously or at times consciously
constructed and performed by us all: the lived experience of gender. Everyone has a gender. To assert that gender identity is
constructed does not mean that it is easily discarded or altered, or that
institutional power does not reinforce and or restrict access to such categories
and therefore present real life consequences for people marginalized by
such divisions. Accordingly,
we at THE Agency believe that we must recognize and protect the right of
each person to self-identity one's own gender. Therefore, one of our current endeavors involves
the popularization of a new pronoun convention: Pe and Per. Pe, pronounced as ÒpayÓ will
replace he or she and Per will replace him or her. Both are short for person. Neither is meant to be a stand in
for androgyny nor a call for gender-blindness, but instead consist of a
means of inviting dialog and at bare minimum prolonging the advent of
applying gender stereotypes to someoneÕs embodied experience. A small change in pronoun language
facilitates the possibility to embrace the playful, fun and most
importantly fluidity of the revolutionary observance of oneÕs place in the
gender galaxy.
|
|
We
at THE G.I.A. are fond of saying "Power Pivots on Perception and
Perception Depends Upon Perspective." Both photography and gender are influenced
greatly by oneÕs point of view.
Even further, photographyÕs potential for repetition lends itself to
the necessity for reiteration in terms of gender identity because the
performance must be repeated in order to claim coherence and insure
readability. However problems
of translation are enormous when gender identity is read. The extent to which we can
predetermine the content of such interpretations
are forever limited. One
carries perÕs predispositions and presuppositions wherever pe goes and in
fact without these preconceived ideas, communication and social action are
impossible. The source
location of identity construction may be mere appearance, but the politics
of being seen and of seeing come alive through the embodiment and action of
such practice and not representation exclusively. As a result, we have included excerpts from each
performerÕs audio transcripts.
However, THE G.I.A. recognizes editing to be a form of translation,
and want you, Dear Reader, to recognize THE AgencyÕs bias in the selection
of which words to include and which to exclude from these pages. Even further, to maintain our
commitment to transparency we have included the original 30 questions asked
of each performer at the end of this book so that every reader is equipped
with further context to understanding the content of each one- act play.
|
|
In
addition, THE G.I.A. wonders if these images increase the visibility of
non-binary gender expression – or does this book present gender variance
in a way that embodies a comfortable contract reached between the artistic
creator, and you the reader for the exchange of the erotic exotification of
the other? It gets even
more complicated because we at THE G.I.A. recognize the futility of claiming
the fixed ownership of the photographic imagesÕ content and most
importantly their meanings. As
the Self-Appointed and Acting Director of THE G.I.A., I ponder, what
happens when one tries to document or represent or make visible something
that is completely dependent upon context, engagement, relationships, and
activity within a ÒstillÓ image.
|
|
|
Therefore,
being cognizant about these limitations, we must let go of the need to have
a cohesive linear narrative.
Life is complex.
Relationships are complicated.
We are all modifying and adapting our behavior depending on the
particular intersection of desires, context, social cues, or perceived
norms, and individual states. As a result THE G.I.A. advocates for the
acceptance of what we refer to as the Gender Galaxy. In this concept and model there is
just space- an infinite space, a space that allows motion. Every gender has
a location that may or may not be fixed. Even further, the model allows for infinite combinations
of gender characteristics. For
example, if one is more feminine it does not automatically follow that one
is less masculine. OneÕs
gender could be high on both axies and therefore gender-full. Each gender identity has its own
axis in space. Different
genders are not linearly or hierarchically related, different genders are
simply that, different.
Therefore, gender revolves around relationship and the gravitational
pull speeds up and slows depending on ones proximity to the center of this
gender universe, which is oneÕs expressive embodied self in interaction
with another. This galaxy
model encompasses self-image and its readability while demanding and
recognizing movement and reconfiguration.
|
Remember,
there is nothing wrong with change, inconsistency, and exploration especially
in relation and in relating to each other. THE G.I.A. investigates the
construction of images as they relate to the construction of gender
identity without the promise for coherence. Our journey, evolution, and exploration at THE Gender
Intelligence Agency remains continuous and embodies the contradictory,
confusing and definitely compounded lived experience of gender identity.

|
|
|